A Possibly Interesting Link
Bert Freudenberg
bert at impara.de
Thu Apr 6 10:45:12 UTC 2006
Am 06.04.2006 um 11:09 schrieb Dan Ingalls:
> Andreas wrote...
>
>> So here we go again:
>>
>> SqueakOnJava: 5,509,641 bytecodes/sec; 324,946 sends/sec
>> SqueakOnC: 203,013,481 bytecodes/sec; 5,797,002 sends/sec
>
> I'm surprised. As Avi reported, I get on my Mac:
>
> SqueakOnJava: 9,211,283 bytecodes/sec; 509,641 sends/sec
> SqueakOnC: 89,824,561 bytecodes/sec; 5,038,709 sends/sec
>
> Actually, if I run the benchmarks in 3.8, I get more like 111M
> bytes/sec, so we've got a bit of an apples vs oranges problem
> (though nothing like Andreas's difference). To be truly fair,
> you'd have to run the mini image (that's what I do). I believe you
> can get that out of the jar, or I'll send it to you if you're
> interested.
To extract the mini image, rename sSqueakOnJava.jar to
sSqueakOnJava.zip, unzip it, locate mini.image.gz, and gunzip that.
> Numbers like 20x to 50x to me indicate either a miserable Java or
> something else going on.
>
> So I'm curious to see some other results.
iMac G5 1,6 GHz, mini.image
Squeak3.8.9beta10: 78,191,814 bytecodes/sec; 4,402,970 sends/sec
JavaHotSpot1.4.2-54: 8,064,516 bytecodes/sec; 474,599 sends/sec
- Bert -
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|