JavaScript Performance Benchmark
SmallSqueak
smallsqueak at rogers.com
Thu Apr 13 18:51:58 UTC 2006
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Dan Ingalls wrote:
> > I've been having fun with JavaScript, and thought folks would enjoy this
> > little tribute to tinyBenchmarks...
>
> I find it interesting that Squeak-on-Java runs faster than
> Javascript-in-Firefox for me, by these tinyBenchmarks. (Sends are faster
> by ~40%; bytecodes are slightly slower.)
>
Actually, it is unfair to compare JavaScript to Squeak.
To set the playing field level, one should compare JavsScript to
SqueakScript, instead ;-)
Cheers,
SmallSqueak.
P.S: BTW, does anyone know what happened to SmallScript?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|