Thanks I would prefer something a bit more formal with more detailed
information.  I look forward to getting the full report.

Ken

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 10:52 -0700, Craig Latta wrote:
> 	Uh, Stef jumped the gun on this one (in particular, he didn't discuss 
> the content of his message with the rest of the board). At this very 
> moment the board is composing a report that already has more to report.
> 
> 
> -C
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060420/c78aa41d/attachment.pgp