version numbers (was: Another try for pre-gamma: #7051)

Jecel Assumpcao Jr jecel at merlintec.com
Thu Aug 3 19:23:35 UTC 2006


Wouldn't it be better to avoid reusing version numbers 7049 to 7052?
Even if the broken images have been removed from all download sites it
is possible that they might show up later and we won't know that this
was the case. Of course, I don't know what problems skipping from 7048
directly to 7053 might cause for the updates systems.

-- Jecel



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list