Thank you Bert, you re+setted me up (needless to say, pun intended :)

On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:06:55 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

> On Dec 17, 2006, at 16:32 , Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I can now see that my "and now it shows to be in almost the same  
>> class as Squeak is" is understood as a strong claim. But it just  
>> expresses my disappointment and desillusion.
>
> I can understand the desillusion part, although it's hardly surprising.  
> I mean, there are benchmarks where Squeak outperforms even standard C.  
> But disappointment? Hardly, unless you believe in magic ;)
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>