Hi Todd,

Todd Blanchard <tblanchard at mac.com> wrote:
> My pet use would be to have a sort of mini-squeak source running in  
> my production seaside image.  IOW, my production image would just  
> look like a SS repository but saves would actually update the running  
> image.  Then I could push fixes directly from my development laptop  
> to my deployed application on my production server.
This sounds like a useful use case. However, I don't understand why you
need full SqueakSource, i.e. the Web UI, for that. Wouldn't just
Monticello and a file upload be enough?

Cheers,
Bernhard