Candidate platforms?

Marcus Denker denker at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Feb 21 19:00:42 UTC 2006


On 21.02.2006, at 09:50, stéphane ducasse wrote:

> I think that what I said counts also for marcus since we wrote the  
> page together.
> But he can add a note.
>

Yes, indeed the list is quite complete... what I would likee to  
stress again (you mentioned
it already): Coordination and communication.

I would like to see the projects / people that use Squeak to work  
together, share their accomplishments
and have fun building a great system...

My personal view of Squeak is that it should be "the System to build  
the next System with". I don't
know what that system of the future will look like, but I am sure we  
can move one step
towards this system by making Squeak simpler to understand, easier to  
modify and extend... better
meta-models, more late binding, better infrastructure, better tools,  
a cleaner code base, modularity,
evolvability....

Ah, and in the subject there was the word platform: I would like  
Squeak to be a platform, a basis for
many very different projects.

     Marcus


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list