About squeak image compatibility (3.6/7/8)

Cees De Groot cdegroot at gmail.com
Sun Jan 8 21:11:07 UTC 2006

On 1/8/06, stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> I have the impression that we should finish fast 3.9 and then 4.0
> should be the throw away party.
Agreed. And the compatibility breakage party, as well (at least as far
as I'm concerned, there's going to be major compatibilty breakage in
files+networking... :-)).

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list