About squeak image compatibility (3.6/7/8)

Avi Bryant avi.bryant at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 10:17:19 UTC 2006


On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:10 AM, Cees De Groot wrote:
>
> However, people can't help wanting something "canonical". And I think
> it'd be good to have something canonical, at the very least for people
> like toolbuilders so they can build cross-distribution tools. We just
> should make the canonical thing very small, I think (Core Squeak)...

If and when such a thing exists, that's great.  We're not even close  
to having a Core Squeak (some image with code that is common to all/ 
most the existing distributions), so I think it would be deceptive to  
label anything as canonical for now.  But it's a good long term goal.

> Would you be willing to maintain a Seaside distribution?

Sure.

Avi



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list