What to do with the PlusTools
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Mon Jan 16 08:58:02 UTC 2006
Cees De Groot wrote:
> On 1/15/06, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>>That I now find
>>bugs assigned to me for a package that for all intents and purposes of
>>Squeak-dev I do not and have no intention to maintain, goes too far.
> Err... insofar you are referencing bugs that I "assigned" to you, IIRC
> these couple of instances were all paired with questions about your
> intentions, hardly with an assignment to fix them...
I'm not sure what you're talking about. I am referring to
which were all assigned to me (I've reassigned them since). And I think
I've made my intentions clear in this post:
> Anyway, a Tools team is in order, and I'd rather would have them go
> with PlusTools than with the current toolset as a starting point.
If you wish to do that, I can't stop you. Just be aware that I have no
plans and intentions to join that team. And please, stop assigning these
bugs to me.
> Brian Brown leads a ToolBuilder team, which hasn't been very active -
> maybe it is an idea to rename it and change the focus?
Bad idea. ToolBuilder is a framework, the tools are an application. You
don't reassign framework people to any specific application (not as long
as you want the framework be usable outside of that application).
More information about the Squeak-dev