Diego

I suggest you to have a look at the testrunner of lukas, Because it  
is real fast and much more usable.
Available in the latest 3.9

stef

On 17 janv. 06, at 15:12, Diego Fernandez wrote:

> Thanks Lucas, I will try it.
> Yesterday I started to do the code coverage tool using "method  
> wrappers", it worked :)
>
> But my unit tests of the coverage tool some times fails and some  
> times pass (I think that is caused by some initialization made by  
> the method wrappers).
> Anyway.. I think that tomorrow I'm going to upload the first  
> version of the package to SqueakMap.
>
> On 1/17/06, Lukas Renggli < renggli at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, is there  
> any tool to do code coverage? (at method level is enough, i
> > want to do something to check that unit test cover all the methods)
>
> You might want to try something like that in any Squeak image:
>
> tallies := IdentityDictionary new.
> prev := [ MAFileModelTest suite run ].
> thisContext sender
>         runSimulated: prev
>         contextAtEachStep: [ :curr |
>                 curr == prev ifFalse: [
>                         (tallies
>                                 at: curr receiver
>                                 ifAbsentPut: [ Set new ])
>                                         add: curr selector ].
>                         prev := curr ] ].
>
> There are some bugs in the simulator that prevent you from running
> tests  that containing #should:raise: and #shouldnt:raise:, else this
> technique works very well and requires no additional package.
>
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>
>