nil in SuspendedDelays???
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Tue Jan 24 03:54:19 UTC 2006
Cees De Groot wrote:
> Should this be adopted?
The VW fix does seem overly complex for Squeak - the main issue is that
in Semaphore>>critical: we can be interrupted between the following two
[blockValue := mutuallyExcludedBlock value] ensure:[self signal].
Simply moving #wait inside the ensure'd block will cure the problem (for
very, very specific and nitpicky reasons that I'm not going to explain
in detail unless someone actually wants to know ;-)
More information about the Squeak-dev