nil in SuspendedDelays???
tim Rowledge
tim at rowledge.org
Tue Jan 24 16:29:30 UTC 2006
On 23-Jan-06, at 10:59 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:
> Well right now it only checks for processes in the same priority
> group, doesn't consider ones higher, mind they should run at some
> point.
Exactly - you don't need to worry about the higher priority processes
since they get a chance to take over at every checkInterrupts.
Fiddling with yield won't achieve anything interesting. If a cpu
sharing scheduler is wanted it would take a quite different chunk of
code.
tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Strange OpCodes: CM: Circulate Memory
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|