nil in SuspendedDelays???

tim Rowledge tim at rowledge.org
Tue Jan 24 16:29:30 UTC 2006


On 23-Jan-06, at 10:59 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:

> Well right now it only checks for processes in the same priority  
> group, doesn't consider ones higher, mind they should run at some  
> point.
Exactly - you don't need to worry about the higher priority processes  
since they get a chance to take over at every checkInterrupts.

Fiddling with yield won't achieve anything interesting. If a cpu  
sharing scheduler is wanted it would take a quite different chunk of  
code.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Strange OpCodes: CM: Circulate Memory





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list