Squeak, source control, subversion, versioning, monticello,
all that good stuff.
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sun Jan 29 07:49:29 UTC 2006
- Previous message: Squeak, source control, subversion, versioning, monticello,
all that good stuff.
- Next message: Squeak, source control, subversion, versioning, monticello,
all that good stuff.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Avi Bryant wrote:
> No, I don't think I would have said that - I certainly don't agree with
> it :) What do you find weak about the merge and diff tools in
> Monticello? I suspect it may be a matter of being poorly documented
> (which they are) rather than technically inferior (I would, in fact,
> claim the opposite).
The worst thing right now for me is the "Keep" vs. "Reject" buttons in
the merge tool. I have to think *every single time* I use it.
Personally, I think that something like "keep local version" vs. "keep
repository version" (this could be abbreviated) would be much clearer.
Cheers,
- Andreas
- Previous message: Squeak, source control, subversion, versioning, monticello,
all that good stuff.
- Next message: Squeak, source control, subversion, versioning, monticello,
all that good stuff.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|