Cees De Groot wrote:
> I think that whoever signs up for a release, should be able to
> prioritize the backlog. Without any intervention from the community,
> rooted in the Roman dictator model: you say you're going to step in
> and fix things, then if the community ok's that you get to be the boss
> for that release. With quarterly releases, I can't think of anyone
> having a problem with that :-)

What if we created a backlog by nominating stories, and then got 
everyone to prioritize it by voting for stories?