Hi Juan,

thanks for commenting. I now think we probably use the original math morphs 
list (not on squeak.org) to communicate as there are likely still other 
interested people subscribed there. But if that turns out not possible, let 
us leave morphic-splitters in existence for now if that's ok. 

Milan
On 2006 May 31 11:36, Juan Vuletich wrote:
> Hi Milan,
>
> I kind of leaded both groups. The Morphic-Splitters group became the
> official Morphic Stewards. So the Morphic-Splitters list is obsolete. I
> don't know if it should be killed, or be left for archival purposes...
>
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Milan Zimmermann" <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca>
> To: "Serge Stinckwich" <Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr>;
> <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>; "Lic.Edgar J.De Cleene"
> <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for
> MathMorphs-Revivalcommunications?
>
> >A question about Morphic lists below:
> >
> > On 2006 May 29 11:53, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> >> Le 29 mai 06 à 18:02, Milan Zimmermann a écrit :
> >> > On 2006 May 29 03:35, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Hum, yes a bit confuse ... maybe we could ask on the squeak-dev list
> >> why there is two lists ?
> >
> > Ok, let me ask: There seem to be 2 Morphic lists: One linked from the
> > Teams
> > site http://squeak.org/Community/Teams/ as Morphic Stewards:
> >
> > http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-browse?list=morphic-spl
> >itters
> >
> > and another one that I cannot find on squeak.org
> >
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
> >
> > For the MathMorphs Revival effort, I suggested creating a list, then
> > Serge sugested we could ask the morphic list to carry the MathMorph
> > Revival communication there - which caused my confusion as to what list
> > (because I did not find the "morphic" list above on squeak.org).
> >
> > So maybe the squeak-dev is the right forum for this question (s):
> >
> > - Is it general knowledge there are 2 morphic lists, and is it a good
> > idea to
> > have 2
> > - Is it ok to use one of them for the MathMorphs revival communication,
> > or better to ask to create a new list for MathMorphs revival?
> >
> > Regarding the second question, we could keep communicating via private
> > email,
> > but that makes harder for others to join, and it seems it is good to have
> > a
> > public record of the changes and discussions.
> >
> > Thanks for any suggestions, Milan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/348 - Release Date: 5/25/2006