Ok.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Milan Zimmermann" <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Cc: "Juan Vuletich" <jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar>; "Serge Stinckwich" 
<Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr>; "Lic.Edgar J.De Cleene" 
<edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 2:38 AM
Subject: Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for 
MathMorphs-Revivalcommunications?


> Hi Juan,
>
> thanks for commenting. I now think we probably use the original math 
> morphs
> list (not on squeak.org) to communicate as there are likely still other
> interested people subscribed there. But if that turns out not possible, 
> let
> us leave morphic-splitters in existence for now if that's ok.
>
> Milan
> On 2006 May 31 11:36, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>> Hi Milan,
>>
>> I kind of leaded both groups. The Morphic-Splitters group became the
>> official Morphic Stewards. So the Morphic-Splitters list is obsolete. I
>> don't know if it should be killed, or be left for archival purposes...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Juan Vuletich
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Milan Zimmermann" <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca>
>> To: "Serge Stinckwich" <Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr>;
>> <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>; "Lic.Edgar J.De Cleene"
>> <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar>
>> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: Is it ok to use a morphic list for
>> MathMorphs-Revivalcommunications?
>>
>> >A question about Morphic lists below:
>> >
>> > On 2006 May 29 11:53, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> >> Le 29 mai 06 à 18:02, Milan Zimmermann a écrit :
>> >> > On 2006 May 29 03:35, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >> Hum, yes a bit confuse ... maybe we could ask on the squeak-dev list
>> >> why there is two lists ?
>> >
>> > Ok, let me ask: There seem to be 2 Morphic lists: One linked from the
>> > Teams
>> > site http://squeak.org/Community/Teams/ as Morphic Stewards:
>> >
>> > http://discuss.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-browse?list=morphic-spl
>> >itters
>> >
>> > and another one that I cannot find on squeak.org
>> >
>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>> >
>> > For the MathMorphs Revival effort, I suggested creating a list, then
>> > Serge sugested we could ask the morphic list to carry the MathMorph
>> > Revival communication there - which caused my confusion as to what list
>> > (because I did not find the "morphic" list above on squeak.org).
>> >
>> > So maybe the squeak-dev is the right forum for this question (s):
>> >
>> > - Is it general knowledge there are 2 morphic lists, and is it a good
>> > idea to
>> > have 2
>> > - Is it ok to use one of them for the MathMorphs revival communication,
>> > or better to ask to create a new list for MathMorphs revival?
>> >
>> > Regarding the second question, we could keep communicating via private
>> > email,
>> > but that makes harder for others to join, and it seems it is good to 
>> > have
>> > a
>> > public record of the changes and discussions.
>> >
>> > Thanks for any suggestions, Milan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.1/348 - Release Date: 
>> > 5/25/2006
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.0/352 - Release Date: 5/30/2006
>
>