The assignment character in 3.9 and onward
Janko Mivšek
janko.mivsek at eranova.si
Thu Jun 8 16:49:52 UTC 2006
Dear Squeakers,
As a newcomer to Squeak, slowly coming from other Smalltalk and a
supporter of as much unified Smalltalk world as possible, I strongly
hope that you will choose := for an assignment operator (or one of
them). Some reasons:
- consistence with other Smalltalks,
- consistence with other languages,
- lower barrier of entry for newcomers.
Best regards
Janko
Ralph Johnson wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Klaus D. Witzel <klaus.witzel at cobss.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:33:55 +0200, Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>> >
>> > I wonder why not use <- , two characters as := , but closer to original
>> > idea.
>
> This is a bad idea, because you would be different from other
> Smalltalks for no good reason. The right solution is to make the
> editor smarter. That way you get compatibility AND a good user
> interface.
>
> -Ralph Johnson
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|