On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:55:21 +0200, Boris Popov wrote:

> Umm, no, receiver of a doit should have nothing to do with the code being
> executed. Here's a VisualWorks implementation, which is more correct  
> given
> the intent of these methods,
>
> #(1) ifEmpty: [nil]	#(1)

That is what I expect, too.

Besides, the current Squeak implementaton of #ifEmpty: does not send  
#value to its argument (a block) ... this method is perhaps an example of  
one bug not canceling the other one ;-)

/Klaus

> #() ifNotEmpty: [nil]	#()
>
> Cheers!
>
> -Boris
>