Proposal for a Squeak migration meeting
Hilaire Fernandes
hilaire at ext.cri74.org
Thu Jun 22 18:40:21 UTC 2006
stéphane ducasse a écrit :
>>>
>>> Tim you are pointing a very important point. After the announce of the
>>> change to APSL2.0 of Squeak1.1, we have to ask ourself which part of
>>> {Squeak3.8}\{Squeak1.1} can be relicensed and probably much more
>>> important which part cannot be relicensed.
>>
>>
>> I very much doubt that there are any parts that cannot be relicensed,
>> if in fact it is even really neccesary. What would be wrong with
>> taking the position that the original squeak license (which is quite
>> adequately free in my opinion) has been rescinded and replaced by the
>> APSL? I think that would be compatible with the SqL clause about
>> relicensing so long as it is no less protective of Apple, since
>> after all they have chosen this new license. Surely *any* code
>> released under SqL can be declared as relicensed?
>
>
> you see tim this what I would like to know from the laywer we contacted
> ( do not remember his name).
Did you get any feedback from the laywer?
How can we make progress regarding this proposal?
Hilaire
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|