"Cees De Groot" <cdegroot at gmail.com> wrote:
> For example, while Squeak Central has always stated that they were
> careful to separate proprietary code from public code during their
> stint at Disney, it was never stated that Disney was not the owner of
> the public code. So we have to assume they are, which means that for
> any of the work done by any SqC member during that time we'd need a
> license grant under the APSL from Disney, not the person who has
> his/her initials on the code.

Which brings us back to my post which (oddly I thought) went more or
less totally uncommented:

	http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-June/105229
.html

Was it too long to read? :)

regards, Göran