I'd rather keep the back arrow, too, even if I had to learn a new multi-key 
combination to enter it.

As for source text versus something "higher level", I'll take source, though I 
have no objection to a Unicode format, as opposed to straight ASCII.  Of 
course changing the image to be so totally non-ASCII might be problematic...

On Wednesday 08 March 2006 05:46, Viktor Svub wrote:
> Dan Corneanu wrote:
> > Marcus Denker wrote:
> >>Before 3.9 goes beta, we will have relaced all the _ by :=, and
> >>everything will be fine.
> >>
> >>      Marcus
> >
> > What happend with '<-' ? I kind of liked it more than ':=' or '_'.
>
> actually, i too would like to see '<-' as an alternative to ':=', it's
> non-ansi, but looks more 'smalltalkish'... some votes?

-- 
To see a need and wait to be asked, is to already refuse.