Hi,

Sorry about the re-asking. I only joined the new list today.

I had the same symptons... During most of the load there was no load on
the CPU as well.

We can continue discussing this on squeak-dev. Perhaps someone on that
side has an idea of what might be wrong.

Kind regards,

Mart-Mari

-----Original Message-----
From: Petr [mailto:petr at madnetwork.org] 
Sent: 17 Maart 2006 02:20 nm
To: magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: Re: For interest: Magma in 3.9a-7008

Hi,
I asked this question here in my e-mail few days ago. I am mostly using 
the 3.9a images and when I tried to load Magma into 3.8, it was 
lightning fast. During most of the loading time, there is was no load on

CPU. It happens with all packages in 3.9a loaded from Monticello. I 
guess we should discuss this issue in the squeak-dev.

Petr

Mart-Mari Breedt wrote:
> Hallo all,
>
> I am not sure whether this mail belongs on the Magma mailing list or
the
> Squeak mailing list. Since my problem only seems to occur when
> installing Magma, I thought it better to post it here first.
>
> This morning I was playing a bit with the new squeak image, 3.9a-7008.
I
> found that installing Magma1.0-cmm.4.mcz (from a local copy) takes
about
> twenty-five (!) minutes. The installation otherwise progresses fine,
> except for a warning towards the end of the installation:
> "CompiledMethod>>who has been deprecated. use #methodClass and
#selector
> directly", but you can still proceed in this case. The same
installation
> in 3.8-6665 doesn't even take a minute.
>
> Maybe someone can venture a guess as to why the Magma installation
takes
> so much longer in the new image? 
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mart-Mari
>
> _______________________________________________
> Magma mailing list
> Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Magma mailing list
Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma