[3.9] Invisible method, missing changeset, backporting?
adi at netstyle.ch
Tue Mar 21 07:34:33 UTC 2006
On Mar 20, 2006, at 19:19 , Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> In Class>>category:, shouldn't the category be stored as Symbol?
yes. I changed that already for the 3.9a but apparently the change
set I sent you was older than that..
> Also, we could just call super, as in #category. I attached a
> changeset which does this.
jep, looks good. In 3.9 I removed the version of category in
ClassDescription, so the super send is not needed there anymore.
More information about the Squeak-dev