SUnit: Skipping tests?
goran at krampe.se
goran at krampe.se
Mon Mar 27 12:24:29 UTC 2006
Hi!
Bert Freudenberg <bert at impara.de> wrote:
> It's all about communicating the test writer's intent to the test
> runner. And I think I'd prefer "x tests, y passed, z skipped" as
> Andreas suggested.
But as Andres Valloud implied, there is a difference between:
- "skipped because I could not run them due to missing resources but I
wanted to run them"
- "skipped because the tests do not even apply to this platform and
there is no point in even trying to run them"
So perhaps even:
"x tests, y passed, z skipped, k not applicable"
:)
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|