ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Fri May 5 15:37:22 UTC 2006
Tx thomas :)
Would be really cool to have them all green :)
On 5 mai 06, at 16:48, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Does anyone have an insight into how we ought to resolve these two
> FloatTest>>ttestNaN5 and >>testZero2 fail in 3.9a 7025. Can they
> can be
> fixed or do we think they're pointing to real problems in Float re
>> From: Paul McDonough wrote
>> ... back to school ... in any case, I'm not 'ppm.'
>> Although I'm sure I was at the same table where those
>> tests were being worked on at CS4 ... hm, don't
>> remember any ppm's. Roger Whitney worked on Floats, I
>> think? And/or Jeff Hallman?
>> --- Thomas Koenig <tomkoenig at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> Hi. We're trying to get all s-unit tests to run clean
>>> in 3.9. I think you
>>> added the following test cases (initials are ppm)
>>> which is why I want to get
>>> your opinion on how to proceed. FloatTest>>ttestNaN5
>>> and >>testZero2 fail in
>>> 3.9a 7025. Can they can be fixed or do you think
>>> they're pointing to real
>>> problems in Float re ieee754? In the latter case
>>> maybe they should be marked
>>> "expected errors"?
>>> Thanks for any help. Tom
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the Squeak-dev