Smalltalk: Requiem or Resurgence? {Dr.
Dobb's Journal (05/06/06) Chan, Jeremy}
Bert Freudenberg
bert at impara.de
Fri May 12 11:51:22 UTC 2006
Am 12.05.2006 um 03:17 schrieb Kendall Shaw:
> The fact that squeak has it's own desktop, effectively makes it
> it's own platform for the purposes of desktop applications.
>
> If your program doesn't look exactly like every other program and
> use exactly the same procedure they've had to use for every
> program, then game over, you might as well not have even bothered
> to write the program.
So Firefox shouldn't have been written? iTunes? Winamp? Etc.?
> I don't think you could easily distribute it as an rpm or a debian
> package etc. and deal with dependencies between squeak
> applications. I can't use installshield to integrate it into
> someone's squeak applications.
I think your utterly wrong here.
> For all practical purposes, a desktop application written in squeak
> will only be used by squeak programmers. Note the term: "desktop
> application".
And I think you'll be proven wrong with Sophie:
http://www.geeksrus.com/sophie/2006-05-09.html
- Bert -
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|