> It's a bit of a hassle to see all those 'ma' methods from magma, but
 
 I would like to reiterate there is NO Magma code in the TMB.  Also, I don't get it, what is the "hassle"?

 If the community likes the TMB, I'll volunteer to help with whatever work is needed for 3.9 incorporation, including removing/renaming whatever methods you want.
 
 Regards,
   Chris
 
----- Original Message ----
From: Duncan Mak <duncanmak at gmail.com>
To: Herbert König <herbertkoenig at gmx.net>; The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:45:15 AM
Subject: Integrating the TracingMessageBrowser to the standard image

Hello,

On 5/17/06, Herbert König <herbertkoenig at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello Zulq,
>
>
> ZA>     - Look at more than one method at the same.
> ZA>     - Edit more than one method at the same time.
> ZA>     - Show how code is related by spatial relation to other code.
>
> all three in the TracingMessagesBrowser. I usually have two of them
> open. Indentation of the control flow, one algorithm in one window,
> even if it spans 20 methods in 10 classes.
>
> I prefer it to a folding text editor, because everything that is
> related to the thing I'm developing is in that single Browser. No way
> to do this with files.
>

Based on your recommandation, I installed the TMB on my 3.9 image.
It's a bit of a hassle to see all those 'ma' methods from magma, but
the functionality of the TMB is brilliant. It integrates very nicely
into the existing tools, and the way it works fits very nicely with
how the message browser already works in the standard image. I really
like it, thanks for your tip!

I nominate adding the TMB into the default image, what work is needed
to be done to get that in 3.9?

Duncan.