Trygve Reenskaug puso en su mail :

> I have tried putting a facade object in front of a Morph, the idea being to
> make a component enclosing a morph substructure. It should be easy; a morph
> is only a submorph of its owner. Right? Wrong! The variety of objects that
> send messages to a simple submorph turned out to be unbelievable. And many
> of them were transient, only existing during the execution of certain
> operations. May be I gave up too easily. Or may be the number of criss
> crossing links in the Smalltalk image makes it impracticable to separate
> out an ensemble of objects without building a new morphic implementation
> from scratch.

I love what you do with BabySRE and found very interersting Towards A New
Discipline of Programming.

If you have any notes not included in the pdf what could share , let me
know.
I was on the Morphic team before and hope rejoin once I meet with Juan.

Very thanks



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam 
Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo 
http://correo.yahoo.com.ar