[PROJECT PROPOSAL] - "Squeak Fenestra"

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue May 23 19:08:58 UTC 2006

Ideally I had once mentioned that having first class packages would  
be useful to
host package comments and license. (avi replied that the license  
should not be linked
to the package but the distribution which may be right but indeed we  
will have to think
about that).


> Andreas Raab wrote:
>> And Unix (X11) shouldn't be all that hard either. BTW, the only  
>> reason why it isn't bundled by default with the Win32 VM is that  
>> apparently the license hasn't been quite set yet and I don't want  
>> to ship stuff with unclear license terms in the VM (nudge, nudge,  
>> Tim, get your Sophie licensing terms in place, please? ;-)
> Sophie stuff is licensed under the new BSD.
> Which brings up the interesting problem on how to make that  
> visible. We don't want to put the license on every class.
> We thought that having license information on package level would  
> be sufficient, but then "someone" would need to add that to  
> Monticello, the source server etc.
> Michael

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list