Daniel said:
> A question to the board: do you agree this would be a good time to get 
> detailed legal advice on how to go about relicensing the rest of Squeak 
> so that the move is legally valid?

Cees previously said

"Indeed. Still, I'll happily base any decisions on how to document
relicensing decisions on the advice we'll hopefully get from our legal
friends, like Dan Ravicher. Bringing the SFLC in is probably step #1."

So that at least indicates someone on the Board is thinking in that direction.

Ken

SFLC = Software Freedom Law Center IIRC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060525/55535817/attachment.pgp