I am standing by Juan's proposal,
do you? (was Re: Removing Etoys, Morphic an
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Thu Nov 2 21:47:51 UTC 2006
Hi Doug,
Doug Way escribió:
> ...
> I'd think it wouldn't be *that* hard to make a loadable EToys package
> for 3.9... it's non-trivial, but I'd think it'd at least be no more
> difficult than the unloading work Juan has already done. (Any
> comments on that, Juan?) It is possible, though, that no one will do
> it. And I certainly wouldn't expect Juan to do it, for example.
> ...
Well, doing it right is really a lot of work. Most of the work in what I
did is to remove knowledge about eToys in non-eToys methods (that I
didn't remove). Lots of them. 'Doing it right' means not keeping
duplicated versions of them (one in eToysLessSqueak and one in eToys
package), but actually refactoring.
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|