Hi Klaus,

On 11/7/06, Klaus D. Witzel <klaus.witzel at cobss.com> wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> is there a way to determine that the running .image is KernelImage or not?

no, it isn't

> If not already, what would be a reliable question (Smalltalk at:
> #Bootstrap ifAbsent: nil) for example.

I think that it will be better to check some eToys class, for example Viewer.

> This is perhaps useful for conditioning package sources when installing
> into KernelImage.
>
> /Klaus
>
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 02:55:04 +0100, I wrote:
>
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > works fine here, module the "restore display" problem reported by others.
> >
> > Thank you for the good work. It forced me to rewrite
> >>
> >> Squeak - "Pavel's" (Etoys + Morphic)
> >>         + "Juan's" Morphic
> >>   = (Squeak - Etoys)
> >>
> >
> > :) There be choice :)
> >
> > /Klaus
> >
> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:03:47 +0100, Pavel Krivanek
> > <squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> here -  http://www.comtalk.net/Squeak/98 - you can download special
> >> package for the KernelImage that includes basic Morphic without eToys.
> >> Prepared image is included too (6.8 MB). This image has no
> >> obsoleteClasses and Undeclared.
> >>
> >> enjoy...
> >>
> >> -- Pavel
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>