About System default unimplemented calls

Pavel Krivanek squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz
Thu Nov 9 11:26:33 UTC 2006


On 11/9/06, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/9/06, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> > Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :
> >
> > > - we should check SystemNavigation default allUnimplementedCalls
> >
> > I do in several images with this result:
> >
> >  Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
> >  Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
> >  Squeak3.9g-7061 195
> >  MinimalMorphic 232
> >
> > And most are the same
> > Create a Excel and text info for this , too big for share.
> >
> > What now ?
> >
> > Edgar
>
> Hi Edgar,
>
> we have to look at all methods where this unimplemented calls are used
> and solve it (modify or remove this methods, implement called methods
> again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and may produce
> accidental DNUs.
>
> We should do that in the KernelImage too...
>
> -- Pavel

Hi Edgar,

we have to look at all methods where this unimplemented calls are used
and solve it (modify or remove this methods, implement called methods
again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and may produce
accidental DNUs.

We should do that in the KernelImage too...

-- Pavel



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list