Hi Jerome

On 11/10/06, Jerome Peace <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com> wrote:
> About System default unimplemented calls
>
> Hi Pavel, Hi Edgar
>
> Check out:
> http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=4544
>
> for tools for splitting up the unimplemented list.
>
> I've been working with 3.9 in mind but the tool ( a
> workspace doit) can easily be adapted to the kernel
> image.
>
> I've also been tackling the problem of removing some
> of the unimplemented callers.
> Searching Mantis for 'unimp' will find a good deal of
> them. Alternately, filtering for reporter 'wiz' will
> uncover all of these fixes plus all my other reports.
>
> Yours in service, --Jerome Peace

I was working on new unimplemented calls that were added by
MinimalMorphic and I decreased it to 10 calls so now I have 105
unimplemented calls in this image. I will publish it later.

-- Pavel

>
> >Pavel Krivanek squeak1 at continentalbrno.cz
> >Thu Nov 9 11:26:33 UTC 2006
> >
> >On 11/9/06, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek at
> gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/9/06, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at
> yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> >> > Pavel Krivanek puso en su mail :
> >> >
> >> > > - we should check SystemNavigation default
> allUnimplementedCalls
> >> >
> >> > I do in several images with this result:
> >> >
> >> >  Squeak3.7-5989-basic 182
> >> >  Squeak3.8-6665 (basic) 185
> >> >  Squeak3.9g-7061 195
> >> >  MinimalMorphic 232
> >> >
> >> > And most are the same
> >> > Create a Excel and text info for this , too big
> for share.
> >> >
> >> > What now ?
> >> >
> >> > Edgar
> >>
> >> Hi Edgar,
> >>
> >> we have to look at all methods where this
> unimplemented calls are used
> >> and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
> implement called methods
> >> again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous
> and may produce
> >> accidental DNUs.
> >>
> >> We should do that in the KernelImage too...
> >>
> >> -- Pavel
> >
> >Hi Edgar,
> >
> >we have to look at all methods where this
> unimplemented calls are used
> >and solve it (modify or remove this methods,
> implement called methods
> >again etc.). Unimplemented can be quite dangerous and
> may produce
> >accidental DNUs.
> >
> >We should do that in the KernelImage too...
> >
> >-- Pavel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
>
>