See: http://weeklysqueak.wordpress.com/2006/11/17/deploying-seaside/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-
> bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:56 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: Re: Preparing a Squeak Image and VM for Production
> 
> > >> - Any reason to use a 3.8 image -- like more stability?
> > >
> > > A lot of people are using 3.7 because of its stability. I wouldn't use
> > > 3.8 unless you need support for special encodings.
> >
> > Is this verified? I'm using 3.7 on servers, too, but just because it
> > works and I have no reason to change the setup. I use 3.8 for daily
> > work without problems.
> 
> Philippe posted a list of patches that we apply to 3.8 images.
> 
> > > 3.9 fixes the multilingual issues of 3.8, so I would prefer 3.9
> > > over 3.8.
> >
> > Are these fixes in 3.8.1, too? If not, which are missing?
> 
> I don't know if these patches are in 3.8.1, they are certainly in 3.9.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lukas
> 
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch