Hi Pavel, Craig,

Pavel's goals listed are of the kind that I agree with, and for what it's 
worth, I'd like to offer my help towards those goals. Given my not so 
extensive experience with Squeak (I mostly play with eToys etc) I would have 
no problem for the board or team to ignore or decline; having said that I 
estimate I should be able to dedicate 10 hours a week (perhaps more)  for the 
release effort (on top of the other about 10 hours that it takes to read the 
Squeak related lists :) ).  

Milan

On 2006 November 23 03:04, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> I would like to collaborate on Squeak 3.10 too but I need to know the
> direction we want to go too. I hope that my vision of the next Squeak
> development is clear - maximal modularization based on small kernel,
> minimal morphic system, loadable eToys, test&build server.
> I would like to know the view of the board on my work and if it is too
> much radical or we will adopt it as the next official stream.
>
> -- Pavel
>
> On 11/22/06, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
> > Hi Bryce--
> >
> > > Would it be possible to post the list of volunteers to the list with
> > > their proposals for the next release? Or better for the volunteers to
> > > post their proposals here? It would be great to know [the direction in
> > > which people would like to take Squeak]. A little public discussion
> > > and visibility would be great.
> >
> >     Squeak-dev has always been an open forum for that (far beyond a
> > little :). Volunteers should feel free, as always, to discuss what
> > they'd like to do for Squeak.
> >
> > > Keep up the good work.
> >
> >     Thanks!
> >
> >
> > -C
> >
> > --
> > Craig Latta
> > http://netjam.org/resume