Squeak and Namespaces
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Thu Nov 30 12:56:40 UTC 2006
On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:13 , Andreas Raab wrote:
> brad fowlow wrote:
>> Given that, do the merits benefit allotting a syntax change (a
>> valuable commodity) that could begin to fork the world into ::-
>> dependent and ::-free code? Or would it would be better to
>> acknowledge that letter-prefixing is just about as good, and free,
>> and already there, and hold out for a stronger solution without
>> colonizing the code pool in the meantime?
>
> Bingo. That's precisely the concern I was voicing earlier.
Is there really a scheme of namespaces that would not support fully
qualified names? Given that Göran's proposal basically suggests one
way of expressing FQNs, shouldn't it be easily supported by any
namespace implementation?
- Bert -
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|