Refactoring to traits / Refactoring traits

stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse at
Mon Oct 2 16:01:58 UTC 2006

Excellent idea.

Now I would start to look at the refactoring in Squeak since they  
could be dramatically improved.
Also supporting package refactorings could be really big plus. Move  
to package. Create package with:....
Having multiple selection for Omnibrowser would be an important point.

>> Hello everybody!
>> I'm starting a research on refactorings & traits as part of a  
>> project ( that luckily :-) could end as my thesis ).
>> Since I'm a newbie, my fist step is this email.
>> The idea and scope are not closed yet but at a first glance the  
>> idea is to add refatoring tools to Squeak for traits, but this  
>> original idea may slightly change since it is being defined as I  
>> get knowledge about the topic.
>> Every paper, link, idea, resource, suggestion about this topic  
>> will be happily welcomed.
>> For sure, as soon as I make some progress, I'll share the results  
>> with any interested on this thread.
> Good idea, yes. You should evaluate the Refactoring Browser  
> (Refactoring Engine). I just hacked it a little so that Tratis are  
> treated like classes. This
> is for sure not what is needed... it should be extended to know  
> about Traits and then we need support for "refactoring towards"  
> traits.
> Should be a nice topic.
>     Marcus

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list