Adding actions to OmniBrowser menu
stephane.ducasse at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 21:07:33 UTC 2006
On 4 oct. 06, at 20:45, Colin Putney wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:01 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>> do you imply based on services :) ?
>> Because it would be nice if we could remove abstractions that are
> No, not based on the services used in 3.9. I tried doing that, but
> I found that I couldn't implement services that would work properly
> regardless of the metagraph used by the browser. Then I tried
> extending services, but the complexity got out of hand pretty quickly.
so may be services could then be improved. I mean having two clients
is always better for stressing the system.
Could you give some feedback to romain?
> So I ended up creating a simple OmniBrowser-specific version of
> services, which will be much easier to deal with. I'm now
> converting the existing actions into OB services.
More information about the Squeak-dev