Adding actions to OmniBrowser menu

stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse at
Wed Oct 4 21:07:33 UTC 2006

On 4 oct. 06, at 20:45, Colin Putney wrote:

> On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:01 AM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>> do you imply based on services :) ?
>> Because it would be nice if we could remove abstractions that are  
>> duplicated.
> No, not based on the services used in 3.9. I tried doing that, but  
> I found that I couldn't implement services that would work properly  
> regardless of the metagraph used by the browser. Then I tried  
> extending services, but the complexity got out of hand pretty quickly.

so may be services could then be improved. I mean having two clients  
is always better for stressing the system.
Could you give some feedback to romain?

> So I ended up creating a simple OmniBrowser-specific version of  
> services, which will be much easier to deal with. I'm now  
> converting the existing actions into OB services.
> Colin

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list