[Io] RE: Web Clients (was Re: Monticello authentication methods?)

stephane ducasse stephane.ducasse at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 21:10:31 UTC 2006


hi todd
what SW stands for? Steve Warring ?

> Yep, that's pretty much how I see it.  Whoever can get to the work  
> and finish it wins.
>
> I have actually started integrating the SWHttpClient, implementing  
> all existing web stuff on top of it, but I have a ways to go and am  
> short on time now.  I could probably get it done about the first of  
> the year.
>
> I've decided I like SWHttpClient because, while it has LOT of  
> classes, it is extremely well factored, does parallel fetching, and  
> has proxy/auth/cookie support.

Lot of classes is not a desease. :)
if this is not too much classes

Stef




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list