[Io] RE: Web Clients (was Re: Monticello authentication
methods?)
stephane ducasse
stephane.ducasse at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 21:10:31 UTC 2006
hi todd
what SW stands for? Steve Warring ?
> Yep, that's pretty much how I see it. Whoever can get to the work
> and finish it wins.
>
> I have actually started integrating the SWHttpClient, implementing
> all existing web stuff on top of it, but I have a ways to go and am
> short on time now. I could probably get it done about the first of
> the year.
>
> I've decided I like SWHttpClient because, while it has LOT of
> classes, it is extremely well factored, does parallel fetching, and
> has proxy/auth/cookie support.
Lot of classes is not a desease. :)
if this is not too much classes
Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|