2006/10/8, Klaus D. Witzel <klaus.witzel at cobss.com>:
> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:45:36 +0200, Philippe Marschall wrote:
> > 2006/10/8, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
> >> Il giorno sab, 07/10/2006 alle 12.17 +0200, Philippe Marschall ha
> >> scritto:
> >> > continuation lang:smalltalk site:squeaksource.com
> >> > but it looks like site is not implemented (and mcz are not indexed) so
> >> > it doesn't work.
> >> >
> >> > But considering the amout of code available at SqueakSource, most
> >> > matches probably will be from there anyway (once it's implemented).
> >> >
> >> > But I think we could play dirty little tricks. List the mcz files as
> >> > zip too in the listing....
> >> > .... now that I think about it .... ;)
> >>
> >> What about sending a mail to the Google Code team
> >
> > Did that but you have to be realistic.
>
> Why would the google crawler index http://www.squeaksource.com/<put id
> here>/ , are there hyperlinks pointing to SqueakSource projects and/or is
> there a (session-less) SqueakSource page which presents hyperlinks of all
> projects to the crawler?

Because google knows anything ;)
http://www.google.ch/search?q=shorecomponents
(2nd hit)

> >> and working with them?
> >
> > How should that work? Submit a patch? Get a job at Google?
>
> Tell them (or blog it) that their competitor is doing it (krugle also
> don't know about .mcz, but: who knows, all squeak-dev members please send
> them email):
>
> - http://www.krugle.com/

Maybe we should start marketing SqueakSource as Web 2.0 of source code
management.

I mean we have:
- wikis
- rss feeds
- tags
- collaboration
- user content
- run on a Mac (a real one, not a soulless MacPC) ;)
- dynamic languages
- continuations/seaside
- a vcs that beats the crap out of everything that is file based
- ...

A blog post from Avi could make a real impact.

Philippe