tim Rowledge wrote:
>
> On 12-Oct-06, at 4:57 PM, Brad Fuller wrote:
>
>> tim Rowledge wrote:
>>> I consider this to be a showstopper:-
> [snip]
>> interesting.... I just tried it and the changes were normal. This is in
>> the 34-dev image which is #7061
>> does the amount of random stuff typed make a difference?
>> (I tried '3+4' and 3+4)
>
> Very curious. Starting a new 7061 image on my OSX G5 Mac
>
> open a workspace
> type 3+4 and print it
>
> open the recent log  -
>  ----SNAPSHOT----an Array(12 October 2006 4:47:43 pm)
> NewSourceReferences-7061.image priorSource: 27317!
>
> 3+4!
>
> now type in the workspace 4+2, printit and open the recent log again -
> ----SNAPSHOT----an Array(12 October 2006 4:47:43 pm)
> NewSourceReferences-7061.image priorSource: 27317!
>
> 3+4!
>
> 3+4 7
>
> 4+2!
>
> As you can see, the previous contents of the workspace are logged
> instead of just the code that was evaluated.
Ok, Tried again and got:

type 4+3 into workspace and print it. Recent log is:
----SNAPSHOT----an Array(12 October 2006 6:25:02 pm) test.image
priorSource: 2405918!

4+3!

then, type in 5+2 on next line and print it. Recent log is:
----SNAPSHOT----an Array(12 October 2006 6:25:02 pm) test.image
priorSource: 2405918!

4+3!

4+3 7

5+2!