Morphic is to MVC as Traits are to Classes (was: Re: Removing Morphic)

Keith Hodges keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Oct 19 03:01:32 UTC 2006


So you dont like traits much?

I agree there is no reason to apply a paradigm where it doesnt fit.

But then I dont know enough about tweak to know whether it would fit or 
not. (see below)

a small question though...

How come I get a longer and quicker reply in a rant as a result of one 
sentence in an email to squeak-dev, than I got from two specific 
requests on Tweak mailing list which was dead for months. The first 
dated (26 May) asking for a current update and strategic direction 
progress information, and the second asking what I could do that would 
be of assistance in porting morphic tools to tweak which received no 
replies.

best regards

Keith
>
>
>
> Bottom line: There are reasons to use traits in lack of alternatives, 
> but if I can avoid it by using self-contained entities (objects) I'd 
> rather not.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list