>From: "Ron Teitelbaum" <Ron at USMedRec.com>
>Reply-To: Ron at USMedRec.com, The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: "'The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list'"<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>Subject: Removing Morphic
>Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:47:52 -0400
>
>Hi J J,
>
>I don't know either.  For me Morphic IS EToys.  For others Morphic IS
>toolBuilder.  For me Tweak is Croquet.  It appears that for others Tweak is
>dead and too slow, (but that seems very short sighted since if Tweak IS
>Croquet then there is major development going on which we could all benefit
>from)
>

Well, I haven't looked at the GUI stuff at all yet (well very little).  For 
me the GUI was my interface as a devoloper and I don't care much how it 
looks, so long as it's fast and not distracting.  But thanks for the 
breakdown on those things, so if I get time I know what things to go read 
about.

>My only goal is community bridges and expanding the opportunities for 
>people
>to contribute and resources for people to use.

I agree.  It seems the more powerful languages (Smalltalk and Lisp) allow 
one to easily make a "dialect" for the problems they are solving and program 
in that.  The problem seems to be, they don't come back.  Just like in 
spoken dialects, it doesn't take long for forks to happen that bar the way 
back (it is interesting to watch german speakers trying to decode the swiss 
dialect. :).

_________________________________________________________________
Try the next generation of search with Windows Live Search today!  
http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline