open process issues (was: Roadmap proposal for 3.10/4.0)

Marcus Denker denker at
Wed Oct 25 06:43:32 UTC 2006

On 24.10.2006, at 22:27, Lex Spoon wrote:

> Marcus Denker <denker at> writes:
>> I added this improved SharedQueue as SharedQueue2 to 3.9 very early:
>> | MarcusDenker  10-07-05 18:09  in 3.9 for further testing
>> Sadly, nobody tested it.
> Right.  As a result of this process, Squeak ends up using the
> known-broken code instead of the tested, believed-fixed code.

If it was tested, why not communicate it?

> Strange, no?  Everyone involved does good work, and we end up in a
> situation like this.

Actually, there was a last "ok, this works" missing. If it was so  
why didn't you add a comment to mantis or send a mail? Fixes and  
anhancements need to be actively supported, especially by their  

In this case it was *only* missing this last "please add this, I  
tested it in 3.9a, it works".


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list