Hi Bert,

Just a comment. My motivation is not "business widgets", but "programmer's
morphs". I want to do stuff like EnvelopeEditorMorph. And of course, my
Morphic 3.0 project.

Cheers,
Juan Vuletich

> Am 26.10.2006 um 14:48 schrieb Klaus D. Witzel:
>
>> Concentrating on the remaining issue(s): why is it so important
>> that Morphic must be independent of Etoys, are they (have they)
>> subclasses etc of each other? Or are there political reasons for
>> having such an independence, or license reasons? Or what (perhaps
>> elegance, perhaps maintainability)?
>
> Etoys support is in the Morphic base classes, and even in its design
> - Morphic really only was made to support Etoys. Now, if you want a
> lean clean Morphic that just supports "business widgets" you have to
> rip everything related to Etoys out. I think that's what Juan did -
> but since the base is missing you cannot go back.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>