andreas.raab at gmx.de
Thu Oct 26 16:21:57 UTC 2006
Hi Roel -
Roel Wuyts wrote:
> For the change notification I only asumed to get the *name* of a renamed
> or removed element to be passed around (whether a class or a method or
> whatever else), not the removed/renamed element itself (for the reasons
> you mention). But the version in the image is not exactly mine (whoever
> put it in there made some changes for better or for worse), and this
> version does not seem to be from me. But ok...
Yeah, it's quite possible. Like I said since the history is gone so I
can't be sure who changed what but since your initials were the last I
thought you might know what these changes are intended for.
> I can fix this, I guess (I think that Nathanael was the maintainer for
> the class builder, but I do not know whether he is still around for
> You need this urgently, I assume ?
I really don't, since I don't use 3.9 at all. It just seems "broken by
design" and I was curious if this is what's causing the traits problem.
> PS: Can you reply personally to me as well ? I do not follow the squeak
> list as often as I should :-( But I do fix things that get included in
> the releases :-)
Sure, can do that. I just don't do it generally unless people ask me
because personally, I'm just the opposite ;-)
More information about the Squeak-dev