3.9 stability, etc.
rwmlist at gmail.com
Mon Sep 4 04:44:43 UTC 2006
I've played around with 3.9 and the interface seems much nicer than
3.8. I had some trouble loading packages--but nothing that I really
need. So, I'm willing to make the plunge (or at least try it out).
What's the best way to move the code I've written in my 3.8 image
over to the 3.9 image? I'm guessing I should save a new change set,
then open that set in 3.9. Is there anything else I should do? Any
gotchas I should watch out for?
On Sep 3, 2006, at 10:23 AM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> This is quite stable. We will try to fix some bugs related to the
> condenseChanges but for normal user this should not have an impact.
> On 3 sept. 06, at 09:28, Rich Warren wrote:
>> It seems like a lot of people are using 3.9 already. Which raises
>> a basic question, should I upgrade?
>> How stable is 3.9. Are there a lot of backward compatibility
>> issues? Are there a lot of things that still need to be ported to
>> 3.9, or is it pretty transparent?
More information about the Squeak-dev