Tutorial Swiki (was Documentation project)

J J azreal1977 at hotmail.com
Thu Sep 7 07:07:33 UTC 2006


That sounds like a good idea.  I don't think it should be the only source of 
documentation
but certainly a good cut for the tutorial side of documentation.


>From: astares at gmx.de
>Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers 
>list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>Subject: Tutorial Swiki (was Documentation project)
>Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:11:49 +0200
>
>Why not provide a tutorial swiki with public read and
>authored write access? We could set up a swiki team to
>provide authored tutorials with screenshots, code and
>screencasts. The swiki team should provide a structure
>and accept articles. (compared to minnow swiki where
>the structure is confusing and outdated content)
>
>Something like
>
>http://vistascript.net/vistascript/docuwiki/doku.php?id=doc:tutorial
>
>I like it's wikipedia style - it's common to users.
>
>Compared to the minnow swiki such a swiki can provide
>a guided tour through squeak and can later be used
>to be turned into a printed book or a free pdf.
>
>The foundation could set up this swiki and provide a meaningful
>url like book.squeak.org. Any comments?
>
>Bye
>Torsten
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
>Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list